Journalism has always been considered an essential pillar in any democracy, since its main function is to inform citizens objectively and truthfully about world events. As a means of transmitting this information, it plays a crucial role in the formation of public opinion and in the control of power.
In a perfect world, media outlets ought to function solely as resources dedicated to the welfare of society, with journalists acting as stewards of democracy tasked with conveying information free from political, economic, or ideological biases. Yet, the truth is far more intricate; the persistent impact of specific interests on the media undermines the integrity and autonomy of thoughtful discourse.
Without free and independent journalism, society becomes susceptible to manipulation and disinformation.
Distortion of Information within Journalism
In this context, it is not surprising that journalism has long been involved in a worrying trend: the manipulation of information to discredit those who oppose the interests of media owners or the alliances they maintain with powerful sectors.
Specifically, public figures who diverge from these interests often face symbolic harassment through the fabrication of information or the relentless reiteration of a singular narrative. This is not merely an isolated incident; rather, it is a widespread tactic that undermines faith in the media and fosters an atmosphere of societal skepticism.
Using techniques such as sensationalism, cherry picking and the dissemination of fake news, certain sectors of the press seek to undermine the reputation of others, fueling polarization and social resentment; a deliberate act of destruction of those who do not align with the interests of the journalist or the media.
The Situation of Odila Castillo Bonilla: A Case of Media Manipulation
Fake news represents a global epidemic and a terminal illness for those in the eye of media power. After fake news is spread, the affected person suffers a symbolic death in the society that consumes that content.
Panamanian attorney Odila Castillo serves as a poignant example of how media manipulation can affect an individual’s life. Certain media outlets have engaged in a defamation campaign to tarnish her personal and professional history. Utilizing tactics like selective reporting and the distortion of facts, these outlets have crafted a damaging narrative intended to erode her credibility.
The unchecked behavior of certain media outlets exposes their manipulative tactics: solely negative content regarding the lawyer is prevalent online, while information about her professional background remains inaccessible. It is clear how an individual, whose life experiences, qualifications, viewpoints, and legal accomplishments are obscured, can be simplified to a name associated only with a negative “accusation.”
Media manipulation poses a significant danger to democracy and to society at large. By eroding confidence in institutions and the media, such practices foster division and weaken the social cohesion. It is crucial for civil society, political leaders, and journalists themselves to come together to challenge this issue and advocate for more ethical and accountable journalism.
